Corporate Social Responsibility Gambling Industry

taiquinebe1986.netlify.com › 〓 Corporate Social Responsibility Gambling Industry

Corporate Social Responsibility Gambling Industry Rating: 9,6/10 7650 reviews

Corporate Social Responsibility Gambling Industry Companies
Corporate Social Responsibility Gambling Industry Act
Corporate Social Responsibility Gambling Industry Definition
Corporate Social Responsibility Gambling Industry Practices

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) POLICY STATEMENT At Datrose, the way we lead, work and behave is driven by our core values. These values influence the way we meet client needs while respecting the regulatory requirements and the way we promote ethically sound practices within Datrose. Corporate Social Responsibility Gambling Industry, nys casino rfp, banque geant casino telephone, ameristar casino kansas city buffet menu. GBC has identified industry best practices & products, formed strategic partnerships with a constellation of star companies, and integrated technological advancements that fearlessly empower and protect private people and corporations with publicly verified information – Ensuring authentic corporate social responsibility.

Hancock, Linda, Schellinck, Tony and Schrans, Tracy 2008, Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR) : re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management, Policy and society, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 55-68, doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.07.005.

Attached Files
Name			Description	MIMEType		Size	Downloads

Title	Gambling and corporate social responsibility (CSR) : re-defining industry and state roles on duty of care, host responsibility and risk management
Author(s)	orcid.org/0000-0003-2953-2353 Schellinck, Tony Schrans, Tracy
Journal name	Policy and society
Volume number	27
Issue number	1
Start page	55
End page	68
Total pages	14
Publisher	University of Sydney
Place of publication	Sydney, N.S.W.
Publication date	2008
ISSN	1449-4035
Summary	During the 1990s, states embraced legalised gambling as a means of supplementing state revenue. But gaming machines (EGMs, pokies, VLTs, Slots) have become increasingly controversial in countries such as Australia, Canada and New Zealand, which experienced unprecedented roll-out of gaming machines in casino and community settings; alongside revenue windfalls for both governments and the gambling industry. Governments have recognised that gambling results in a range of social and economic harms and, similar to tobacco and alcohol, have introduced public policies predicated on harm minimisation. Yet despite these, gaming losses have continued to climb in most jurisdictions, along with concerns about gambling-related harms. The first part of this article discusses an emerging debate in Ontario Canada, that draws parallels between host responsibility in alcohol and gambling venues. In Canada, where government owns and operates the gaming industry, this debate prompts important questions on the role of the state, duty of care and regulation ‘in the public interest’ and on CSR, host responsibility and consumer protection. This prompts the question: Do governments owe a duty of care to gamblers? The article then discusses three domains of accumulating research evidence to inform questions raised in the Ontario debate: evidence that visible behavioural indicators can be used with high confidence to identify problem gamblers on-site in venues as they gamble; new systems using player tracking and loyalty data that can provide management with high precision identification of problem gamblers and associated risk (for protective interventions); and research on technological design features of new generation gaming products in interaction with players, that shows how EGM machines can be the site for monitoring/protecting players. We then canvass some leading international jurisdictions on gambling policy CSR and consumer protection. In light of this new research, we ask whether the risk of legal liability poses a tipping point for more interventionist public policy responses by both the state and industry. This includes a proactive role for the state in re-regulating the gambling industry/products; instituting new forms of gaming machine product control/protection; and reinforcing corporate social responsibility (CSR) and host responsibility obligations on gambling providers – beyond self-regulatory codes. We argue the ground is shifting, there is new evidence to inform public policy and government regulation and there are new pressures on gambling providers and regulators to avail themselves of the new technology – or risk litigation
Notes	Full title of publication is; Policy & society : journal of public, foreign and global policy
Language	eng
DOI	10.1016/j.polsoc.2008.07.005
Field of Research	160510 Public Policy
Socio Economic Objective	970116 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society
HERDC Research category	C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice	©2008, Elsevier
Persistent URL	http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30018005

Document type:	Journal Article
Collections:	Faculty of Arts and Education School of International and Political Studies

Related Links
Link		Description
Connect to published version Go to link with your DU access privileges

Citation counts:	Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 42 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics:	1746 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads - Detailed Statistics
Created:	Fri, 14 Aug 2009, 13:59:37 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

AUTHENTIC CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY & NONPROFIT FUNDRAISING INTEGRITY

A NEW HAMPSHIRE BENEFIT CORPORATION

Not just token CSR. The Gaming Benefits Corporation (GBC) mission is to implement and authenticate corporate social responsibility (CSR) and nonprofit funding integrity through integration of our proprietary platforms, certified and secured with decentralized ledgering technology.

GBC ‘s value proposition is centered on dynamic solutions supported by emerging technology borne out of the gaming industry. Executive decisions are not arbitrary, but authoritative, providing for a deeper sense of corporate accountability and hyper-local community benefits.

Our innovation is built upon blockchain and other proprietary technology that creates a level of transparency and dimension of trust forming a mutually beneficial relationship between companies and their employees, customers, stakeholders, and the broader communities with whom they interact.

GBC has identified industry best practices & products, formed strategic partnerships with a constellation of star companies, and integrated technological advancements that fearlessly empower and protect private people and corporations with publicly verified information – Ensuring authentic corporate social responsibility.

In response to the present need to regain confidence that it is safe to work at and attend school, we are proposing innovative value-propositions that fearlessly empower and protect people with information, and create a level of transparency and dimension of trust forming a mutually beneficial relationship between schools and employees, students, stakeholders, and the broader community with whom they interact – establishing accountability in the urgent process of creating a safer, multi-dimensional educational environment for the community in a socially responsible way.

Bettering Returns to Community with Local Lottery for Nonprofits

Tara Sue Myers

President

Michael McLaughlin

Director

Michael Mendyk

Director

Ross Myers

Director